|
Post by benwayshouse on Feb 20, 2005 20:09:05 GMT -5
After constant completions of Astro Boy (Goodness I need to stop playing that ), I decided to play FFTA again, and I'm glad I did. It's such a great game! Anyone else played it recently? I also should get back to Metroid Zero Mission so I can beat it and get Metroid Fusion...
|
|
Jason-RN
Ice Climber. Chill.
Posts: 8,126
|
Post by Jason-RN on Feb 20, 2005 22:00:49 GMT -5
I haven't played FFTA in a long time. I don't know why I haven't, either. It's an awesome game and a nice change of pace for the Final Fantasy series.
|
|
|
Post by benwayshouse on Feb 21, 2005 7:58:23 GMT -5
I haven't played FFTA in a long time. I don't know why I haven't, either. It's an awesome game and a nice change of pace for the Final Fantasy series. I know, noe I think I'm compelled to complete the game. It's so awesome, it makes me wish I had Fire Emblem, which apparently also is an awesome SRPG.
|
|
Jason-RN
Ice Climber. Chill.
Posts: 8,126
|
Post by Jason-RN on Feb 21, 2005 21:12:01 GMT -5
I know, noe I think I'm compelled to complete the game. It's so awesome, it makes me wish I had Fire Emblem, which apparently also is an awesome SRPG. Yeah, I've heard that Fire Emblem is great. I don't have it, though... I should probably buy it one of these days. *adds FE to list of "I'll get it eventually" games*
|
|
|
Post by Dan-RN on Feb 22, 2005 20:18:28 GMT -5
FFTA was... well, stale. I got bored with it at 20 hours. I had to force myself to play the last 16 or so hours of it.
It just became the same mission over and over and over... so tedious. It was a fun game, but it grew old way too quickly for a game of its nature.
|
|
Jason-RN
Ice Climber. Chill.
Posts: 8,126
|
Post by Jason-RN on Feb 22, 2005 22:59:44 GMT -5
FFTA was... well, stale. I got bored with it at 20 hours. I had to force myself to play the last 16 or so hours of it. It just became the same mission over and over and over... so tedious. It was a fun game, but it grew old way too quickly for a game of its nature. I think that's part of the reason I haven't played it lately. It was a lot of fun at first, but became too repetitive. Square-Enix did nothing wrong... It's just that there's only so much of FFTA's gameplay you can play in one sitting.
|
|
|
Post by benwayshouse on Feb 24, 2005 6:51:08 GMT -5
Yeah, I've heard that Fire Emblem is great. I don't have it, though... I should probably buy it one of these days. *adds FE to list of "I'll get it eventually" games* You don't have it? I thought I saw FE in your Game Collection on IGN...
|
|
Jason-RN
Ice Climber. Chill.
Posts: 8,126
|
Post by Jason-RN on Feb 24, 2005 22:56:50 GMT -5
You don't have it? I thought I saw FE in your Game Collection on IGN... Nope, it's not on my list, lol.
|
|
|
Post by benwayshouse on Feb 25, 2005 7:46:18 GMT -5
Nope, it's not on my list, lol. Oh, okay. I remember seeing it. My friend looooves Fire Emblem. He wants me to get it so we can link up and play. For now, we could try FFTA linked up together, but it might not happen since we just got a snowstorm.
|
|
Jehuty
Pianta
What bags? These bags? Well they're my bags now!
Posts: 229
|
Post by Jehuty on Feb 26, 2005 16:35:46 GMT -5
FFTA was... well, stale. I got bored with it at 20 hours. I had to force myself to play the last 16 or so hours of it. It just became the same mission over and over and over... so tedious. It was a fun game, but it grew old way too quickly for a game of its nature. Yeah, it was fun at first..but once you did 50 to 60 or so missions, you started to realize that they were all the same maps and same enemy placements. =/ Kinda sad, I was hoping for a portable FFT.
|
|
Leverish
Phantom Ganon
You may have known me as "Nintendo Nerd"
Posts: 921
|
Post by Leverish on Feb 27, 2005 13:45:43 GMT -5
Oh, okay. I remember seeing it. My friend looooves Fire Emblem. He wants me to get it so we can link up and play. For now, we could try FFTA linked up together, but it might not happen since we just got a snowstorm. No! Multi player is pretty bad. You just some warriors and then your in a room and you just choose a guy to attack another guy. You don't move on a board or anything. And it's not like Pokemon where you choose which attack you want to attack with. You choose and then they fight. Very boring. You probably read that in my review already. I heard Advance Wars is a good SRPG.
|
|
|
Post by benwayshouse on Feb 27, 2005 17:19:08 GMT -5
No! Multi player is pretty bad. You just some warriors and then your in a room and you just choose a guy to attack another guy. You don't move on a board or anything. And it's not like Pokemon where you choose which attack you want to attack with. You choose and then they fight. Very boring. You probably read that in my review already. I heard Advance Wars is a good SRPG. I bet he didn't think it was like that... I want Advance Wars. I don't know if I should pick up the GCN version since I really don't like RTS's as much as I'd like.
|
|
Leverish
Phantom Ganon
You may have known me as "Nintendo Nerd"
Posts: 921
|
Post by Leverish on Feb 27, 2005 18:00:42 GMT -5
I bet he didn't think it was like that... I want Advance Wars. I don't know if I should pick up the GCN version since I really don't like RTS's as much as I'd like. I personally think RTS' do better on the GBA.
|
|
|
Post by benwayshouse on Feb 27, 2005 18:05:10 GMT -5
I personally think RTS' do better on the GBA. And... what RTS' exist on GBA?
|
|
|
Post by GreenCloud8 on Mar 1, 2005 21:47:27 GMT -5
And... what RTS' exist on GBA? there's this terrible game(IMO) called mech platoon. its a hard and confusing RTS.
|
|