|
|
Post by unknownDUST on Dec 23, 2004 13:32:16 GMT -5
1. Ok, not to be offensive but I just got this website and I've been reading the reviews. About half of the information is not accurate. For Example, on your I-Ninja review, you have told the people that the gameplay is unoriginal, correct? Well you roll in a friggin ball, that IS pretty original. Furthermore there can only so many types of games. So game creaters have no other choice but to create games with the same gameplay as another game. Or create a hybrid. Think how many games have the same RPG style as Final Fantasy. Would you give all those games a bad rating?
Solution : I suggest you have more then one reviewer rating each game, therefore you can keep away from a bias judgment of the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Respect the Vampire on Dec 23, 2004 14:56:44 GMT -5
Spinning up into a ball has been around since Sonic the hedgehog, to hint you a clue, that was 1991....
|
|
|
|
Post by benwayshouse on Dec 23, 2004 15:36:43 GMT -5
Wow, this was a stupid post. I-Ninja, well, I thought it wasn't original but it DID have a jumbo-sized variety. And rolling in a ball isn't original. But it wasn't around since Sonic the Hedgehog. Heck, it was before his time: the oldest form of turning into a ball that I know of was one of the Metroid games.
|
|
Jason-RN
Ice Climber. Chill.
Posts: 8,126
|
Post by Jason-RN on Dec 23, 2004 17:08:19 GMT -5
Thanks for the feedback and welcome to the RN Forums, unknownDUST.  The thing about I-Ninja is that it's a fun game. But, it doesn't bring anything new to the table. Metroid, Sonic and Super Monkey Ball used the ball-rolling gameplay before I-Ninja was released. Also, how is the information in RN's reviews not accurate? Reviews are written based on a person's opinion. I felt that I-Ninja did have a lot of gameplay variety. However, it really needed to do something special to do better than the average platformer. I think it was getting there, but it didn't quite make it. You can't really argue that someone's opinion is wrong.  I'd also like to point out that 8.0/10 is still a good score. As I put it on the Game Reviews main page, 8.0 is "a good game that's worth looking into." |
|
|
|
Post by unknownDUST on Dec 23, 2004 20:46:44 GMT -5
Note: may i ask why you put that up? As is said before gameplay is always brought back. You still have not prooven me wrong. You just added on upon my argument. May i add what type of pro/positive is "Fun to Play".
|
|
Jason-RN
Ice Climber. Chill.
Posts: 8,126
|
Post by Jason-RN on Dec 23, 2004 22:10:24 GMT -5
Note: may i ask why you put that up? As is said before gameplay is always brought back. You still have not prooven me wrong. You just added on upon my argument. May i add what type of pro/positive is "Fun to Play". Could you please explain yourself in a little more detail? I really don't see how my comments supported your argument. Also, the "Fun to play" thing means exactly what it says. I-Ninja is fun to play. It's nothing innovate, nothing different; but it's fun. |
|
