|
|
Post by Pilgrim John on May 12, 2006 21:26:09 GMT -5
i think that a cool action game would be star fox adventrue Starfox adventure is an Adventure-type game. You know, one based on exploration over fighting. I believe you meant Starfox Assault? |
|
|
|
Post by ruben_gamer4life on May 13, 2006 21:07:02 GMT -5
i think that a cool action game would be star fox adventrue Starfox adventure is an Adventure-type game. You know, one based on exploration over fighting. I believe you meant Starfox Assault? sorry thats the game i meant  |
|
Jason-RN
Ice Climber. Chill.
Posts: 8,126
|
Post by Jason-RN on May 14, 2006 23:32:50 GMT -5
As true as that sounds, imagine if Nintendo went that way of thinking with Mario: "It's just some dude jumping around, why should we change anything?" Mario 2 was way different from one, and Mario 3 was different from the first two, etc. This way, it makes you appreciate each and every game in the series. If a company just slaps add-ons to their IPs, well, it's the same as popping caps into the prequel's skull. Just look at what EA does with Madden. But yeah, your statement is true TO A POINT. RockStar tried adding more to GTA, but the added content, while vast, was mostly unnecessary. Why did they add basketball, dating, and dieting into a game about high-stakes crime? It doesn't make any sense to me. However, Sega isn't like RockStar, so I can expect some interesting things from Monkey Ball Adventure. If it isn't good, well, you'll know where I'll be. Good point. I think that change is good for some franchises. Like you said, Mario is obviously a franchise that Nintendo can change. Just look at what the Big N is doing with Mario Galaxy. It's totally different from past games in the series. |
|
|
|
Post by ruben_gamer4life on May 16, 2006 18:32:34 GMT -5
As true as that sounds, imagine if Nintendo went that way of thinking with Mario: "It's just some dude jumping around, why should we change anything?" Mario 2 was way different from one, and Mario 3 was different from the first two, etc. This way, it makes you appreciate each and every game in the series. If a company just slaps add-ons to their IPs, well, it's the same as popping caps into the prequel's skull. Just look at what EA does with Madden. But yeah, your statement is true TO A POINT. RockStar tried adding more to GTA, but the added content, while vast, was mostly unnecessary. Why did they add basketball, dating, and dieting into a game about high-stakes crime? It doesn't make any sense to me. However, Sega isn't like RockStar, so I can expect some interesting things from Monkey Ball Adventure. If it isn't good, well, you'll know where I'll be. Good point. I think that change is good for some franchises. Like you said, Mario is obviously a franchise that Nintendo can change. Just look at what the Big N is doing with Mario Galaxy. It's totally different from past games in the series. change is always good but too much change can kill it. for example ddr:mario mix  |
|
|
|
Post by Pilgrim John on May 17, 2006 11:37:05 GMT -5
Ugh, Mario Mix is collector's item only. They even managed to "suckify" the Dr. Mario theme, and that takes all kinds of awful talent. |
|
|
|
Post by ruben_gamer4life on May 20, 2006 8:25:03 GMT -5
Ugh, Mario Mix is collector's item only. They even managed to "suckify" the Dr. Mario theme, and that takes all kinds of awful talent. i have the game and i've lost lost weight playing it  . but it gets easy after a while even though i'm on super-hard |
|
